Sunday, September 25, 2011

Confusion over electoral districts

Dear readers

I would be lying if I said I understood all the fine points of Egyptian election laws, but Allah knows I am trying!

Again, on September 21, 2011, Assistant Defense Minister Mamdough Shahin announced that the parliamentary elections will be held as scheduled, under a mixed system of 50 percent list-based and 50 percent single-winner candidacies. People's Assembly elections will be held separately from those of the Shura Council. The People's Assembly elections will be held at the end of November over three stages of two weeks each. 

Somehow, Egyptian law as recently passed by the SCAF requires that 50 percent of parliament should be made up of farmers and workers. I like this sentiment. I think it is great. But as an academic, I wonder who decides exactly who is a farmer or a worker? Who makes the decision? What is the test? Are we looking for small farmers, fellaheen, or will anyone with land under cultivation do? This creates a post-modernist dilemma for me? In whose hands does the decisionmaking lie?

Further, there is unhappiness over electoral districts. There is a military backed electoral law regarding the mapping of electoral districts. Many parties are unhappy with it, including Egypt Freedom, Egyptian Social Democratic Party, Free Egyptians and Wasat party. The law, apparently, seems to help the old NDP. Once I understand what the law actually says, I will be sure to let you know.

The 25 January Revolution Youth Coalition as well as the Muslim Brotherhood-led Democratic Alliance for Egypt may announce their lists of candidates before the parliamentary poll scheduled for November.

Adel al Morsy, head of the Military Judicial Authority, has announced that the State of Emergency will continue until June 30, 2012. 


4 comments:

  1. Love the article! Such as exciting stuff here, absolutely fabulous!


    Job Specifications

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dear Shaik. Thank you very much. Please let me know what you are interested in reading about.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sometimes I wonder if this confusion is intentional to deter people from ever going to vote or worse--just voting for their jolly old ex-NDP candidate with the fat wallert and less than squeaky clean resume :-S

    ReplyDelete
  4. Dear Fem

    You have raised a good point. The confusion does make voting less appealing. It makes citizens nervous. I also wonder if the approach is intentional.

    WMB

    ReplyDelete